Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1550 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 14:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 69
2-Core 121
55% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 323
35% 277 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 31.4
25% 30.8 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 20.2
23% 29 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 166 127 132 150 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 921
Mixed 793
SusWrite 180
181% 818 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 36
118% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 374
269% 350 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 118%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
299GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 115 113 114 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 49.9
Write 103
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 113
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FR Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 18
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 4R 9G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 16% 96 210 59 165 27" 1280 720 IVM6682 PL2766H
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback