Today's hottest deals

HP 255 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A1B
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220407
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 08:50
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 112
45% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 386
35% 296 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8A1B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 28.5
7% 18.6 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 22.4
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 834 823 844 841 862 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,243
Write 1,048
Mixed 1,064
SusWrite 846
236% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 54.4
174% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 427
314% 415 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 174%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM3200HSB-8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 24.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 14 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO499F
Typical 255 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback