Medion E15410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMedion E15410  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MF50CM
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 23:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 564
36% 346 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A04B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 12.5
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN025SA356-Y01Q2R0 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 378
Write 73
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 41.3
28% 132 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 0.6
30% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 30.7
43% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FN 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.2% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0700
Typical E15410 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback