Today's hottest deals

Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 08:03
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 110
51% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 286
32% 252 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 21FD) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 25.4
20% 26 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 19.3
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$57
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 370 319 336 342 341 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 390
Write 370
Mixed 333
SusWrite 344
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 42.4
136% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 42.2
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 54
45% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600G 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 0 0.7" 1280 720 FNI0000 LCD TV
Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback