Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOegstone Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 16:03
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 179
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 506
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.2% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 36.6
34% 45.4 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 47
38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 138 38 98 27 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 444
Write 400
Mixed 379
SusWrite 94.8
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 26.4
115% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 47.9
97% 193 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 101%
INTEGRAL 1TB
81GB free
Firmware: 0213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 40 39 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.1% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 39.2
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 38.7
9% 39 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 11.5
40% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 15.1 MB/s
Wd1004fbyz-23yc 00MX125D7A09664LEN 1TB
619GB free
Firmware: WH08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 168 167 175 168 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 131
Write 226
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 171
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
288% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 7% 15 74 56 75 27" 1280 720 PHLC208 PHL 271E1
Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback