Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOegstone Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 168
52% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 296
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.7% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 36.7
33% 45 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 51
Splatting 46.6
38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 41 81 40 87 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 407
Write 399
Mixed 361
SusWrite 81.5
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 21.9
92% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 1.9
67% 158 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 101%
INTEGRAL 1TB
78GB free
Firmware: 0213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.4% Very poor
Read 50.6
Write 37
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 38.2
9% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 10.3
37% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 15 MB/s
Wd1004fbyz-23yc 00MX125D7A09664LEN 1TB
609GB free
Firmware: WH08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 178 170 173 174 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 50.7
Write 154
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 174
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0
60% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 27 75 27" 1280 720 PHLC208 PHL 271E1
Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback