Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-176K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GX70 3CC
MotherboardMSI MS-176K  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024x768x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 20:55
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5750M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 86.1
41% 65 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 111
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 10EF) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 22.10.01.03
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 5.8
4% 6.03 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 74 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 293
Write 73.2
Mixed 111
SusWrite 74.1
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 18.7
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 91.1
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 82.6
63% 84.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
346GB free
Firmware: GH2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 116 118 114 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 116
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Poor
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 44 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMO1720
Typical MS-176K Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-176K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback