Metabox Alpha-SR NP50SND

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive393% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMetabox Alpha-SR NP50SND  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NP5x_6x_7x_SNx
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 13:17
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U29, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 64.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 265
81% 153 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 991
91% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,791
111% 1,791 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A650) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 9.3
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 10.9
10% 12 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Metabox Performance 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3524 3615 3109 3562 3613 3699 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 1,608
Write 3,819
Mixed 2,048
SusWrite 3,520
628% 2,749 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 65.7
214% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 1,110
818% 1,081 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 393%
Great: 493%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.C8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 49.8
MC Mixed 54.2
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 135%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1540
Typical Alpha-SR NP50SND Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

System: Metabox Alpha-SR NP50SND

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback