MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 03:41
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$161
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 327
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1005
98% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,506
93% 1,506 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 70
50% 67.6 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 54.7
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
694GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2080 2211 2265 2265 2076 1402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,017
Write 2,062
Mixed 1,451
SusWrite 2,050
427% 1,895 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 40.8
197% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 606
546% 818 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 305%
Great: 352%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
234GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 61 59 74 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 261
Write 48.7
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 65.7
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 7.2
37% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 126
117% 189 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 299%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
32GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 143 126 184 154 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 84.7
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 146
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
143GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 88 88 86 81 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 94
Write 98.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 82.7
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2133C14/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2133C14/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.9% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 25.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 24.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 56 60 27.9" 2560 1440 PHL08F2 PHL 288P6L
Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 6,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback