Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive405% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 199
2-Core 380
121% 225 Pts
4-Core 769
8-Core 1,302
126% 1,035 Pts
64-Core 1,782
110% 1,782 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 125
Parallax 167
73% 127 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 156
122% 150 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4373 3074 1626 821 359 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
405% Outstanding
Read 2,228
Write 4,420
Mixed 2,703
SusWrite 1,768
631% 2,780 MB/s
4K Read 76.5
4K Write 311
4K Mixed 115
428% 167 MB/s
DQ Read 1,878
DQ Write 1,594
DQ Mixed 1,700
1,283% 1,724 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 405%
Great: 441%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
440GB free
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 475 476 475 475 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,580
Write 479
Mixed 630
SusWrite 475
225% 1041 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 65.1
259% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 573
455% 645 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 242%
Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
122GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 496 495 496 495 358 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 488
Mixed 422
SusWrite 473
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 64.2
221% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Fikwot FN950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN12362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3669 3649 3538 3639 3653 3658 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
563% Outstanding
Read 4199
Write 4,148
Mixed 2,804
SusWrite 3,634
831% 3,696 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 93.8
342% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1,295
DQ Mixed 1,454
1,106% 1,500 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 563%
Great: 560%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
121GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 161 158 164 163 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 92.5
Write 133
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 158
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
11GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 119 115 132 142 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 119
Write 115
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 137
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
198% Outstanding
MC Read 77.1
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 72
204% 71.3 GB/s
SC Read 65.8
SC Write 59
SC Mixed 63.7
180% 62.8 GB/s
Latency 42.1
95% 42.1 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 198%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,080
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback