Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '23 at 05:00
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 161 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 409 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15 6,831 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 0122) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.7 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 2%
AMD RX 460-$75 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 22D6) CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 30.9 19% 27.7 fps	MRender 27.8 Gravity 25.1 Splatting 20 19% 24.3 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 22%
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 2270) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	8.32% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 14.9 9% 12.3 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 8.6 8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.32% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 47 53 50 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 329 Write 174 Mixed 190 SusWrite 45.4 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 20 77% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 77.1 DQ Mixed 127 103% 152 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 124%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$270 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 109GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 42 51 49 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 323 Write 163 Mixed 202 SusWrite 44.1 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 23.3 87% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 126 97% 137 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 88%
Corsair Force 3 60GB 4,789 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 46GB free Firmware: 5.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 42 46 44 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 170 Write 69.5 Mixed 102 SusWrite 40.3 21% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 14.6 56% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 50.8 DQ Mixed 95.6 70% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 52%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 793GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.8 10 8.9 11 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 234GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 8.9 9.7 12 10 9.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-401.A00LF 4x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 12 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	27"	1280 720	SAM07CE SMS27A350H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $154

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $70Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,591x
Core i7-3770KIntel $150Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	989x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	591x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	325x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	283x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	244x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	180x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	147x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	111x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	92x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $504

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406