Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 23:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$122
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 657
76% 594 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$148
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 53.2
45% 55.6 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 47
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 413 419 170 174 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 466
Write 415
Mixed 344
SusWrite 212
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 23.4
117% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 0.9
29% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
339GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 89 88 85 82 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 81.3
Write 111
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 82
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
203% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$70
450GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 73 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 80.9
Write 82.6
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 73.1
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4W.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 25.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 20 240 27" 1920 1080 MSI9CA9 MSI G27C4X
Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback