Today's hottest deals

Asrock 4X4-V1000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 4X4-V1000  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190923
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 21:32
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Vega Gfx
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 186
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 442
49% 386 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
ASRock(1849 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.50.33.01
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 15.4
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTS430S 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427DNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 131 136 137 138 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 490
Write 138
Mixed 196
SusWrite 136
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 31.1
111% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 116
94% 133 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 21.5" 1280 720 PLN2235 PCT2235
Typical 4X4-V1000 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 4X4-V1000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $73
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback