Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime39.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 18:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 213
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 457
51% 403 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 6.4
4% 6.4 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 9
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 1570 1542 1508 1502 1461 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,863
Write 1558
Mixed 1,403
SusWrite 1,517
356% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 51.9
168% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 537
394% 520 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 242%
Great: 410%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
82GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 127 129 119 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 124
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
233% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 859B CB8GS2666.C8ET 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 20.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 15.5" 1536 793 AUO60ED
Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback