Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 16:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 195
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 458
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 33.7
21% 29.2 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 19.7
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXZ83A0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,220
Write 1,039
Mixed 623
213% 961 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 43
147% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 352
261% 346 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 203%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
220GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.7% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 41.5
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 40.7
9% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 12.5
43% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 29.3
DQ Mixed 26.3
21% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x394A53463531323732415A2D314739453220 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5BC2 LG ULTRAFINE
Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback