Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 638 x 370 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU 0, 16 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 70.5
34% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 390
29% 263 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 161GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 7.3 3.6 83 40 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 509
Write 324
Mixed 360
SusWrite 59.2
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 18.4
48% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 239
172% 221 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 4x16GB
4 of 128 slots used
64GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 28.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 206%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 4 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback