Today's hottest deals

Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 13:03
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$249
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1044
96% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,889
117% 1,889 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 172
Parallax 177
139% 173 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 149
Splatting 128
126% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,377
Write 560
Mixed 1,564
328% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 60.8
197% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 613
451% 597 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
2TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,426
Write 1,467
Mixed 1059
294% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 59.1
195% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 574
442% 606 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 282%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 90.6
99% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Seagate BUP RD 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0108
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 77.2
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
166% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 66%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 113
Mixed 73.5
131% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWX16GC3000C16W4D 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 25.6
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 100 34" 1280 720 HPN3364 HP ENVY 34
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 134% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback