Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LX  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 00:23
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 89
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 124
60% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 174
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$55
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 18 28 18 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 68.1
Write 54.5
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 32.6
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29%
Great: 55%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
0GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 4.3 3.7 2.9 4.5 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 499
Write 1.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.5
86% 128 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Mixed 0
196% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 41 60 0" 1280 720
Typical P8H67-M LX Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback