Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOegstone Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 492
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.9% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 57
Parallax 53.8
46% 55.5 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 46.3
38% 46 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 81 69 82 41 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 417
Write 324
Mixed 352
SusWrite 96.9
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 23.7
102% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 50.8
100% 198 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 101%
INTEGRAL 1TB
206GB free
Firmware: 0213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.5% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 37.4
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 38.6
9% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 10.1
37% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 15.2 MB/s
Wd1004fbyz-23yc 00MX125D7A09664LEN 1TB
838GB free
Firmware: WH08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 181 178 188 181 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 190
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 184
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
268% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 212 59 75 27" 1280 720 PHLC208 PHL 271E1
Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback