Today's hottest deals

Asus N71Ja

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N71Ja  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N71Ja
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 42.1
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 72.9
34% 55 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 104
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 127
Write 88.4
Mixed 71.9
21% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 8.7
34% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 105
55% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 17.3" 1600 829 LGD01DD
Typical N71Ja Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N71Ja

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback