Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 14:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 4700S 8-Core Desktop Kit
BL5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 56.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
68% 128 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 858
76% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 111
Parallax 116
96% 115 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 84.4
84% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
480GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 364 374 383 325 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 378
Mixed 375
SusWrite 323
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 28.4
146% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 45.6
82% 161 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 91%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown U... 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
175% Outstanding
MC Read 56.9
MC Write 71.4
MC Mixed 85.2
203% 71.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 27.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 168%
This bench: 175%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 7 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback