Today's hottest deals

Samsung 960XFH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive380% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 960XFH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960XFH-XA1US
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 21:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 67.9
1-Core 184
2-Core 367
106% 206 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,036
105% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,651
102% 1,651 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1CC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 32
Parallax 30.8
21% 29.5 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 0.3
15% 21.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7FK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2136 2066 2055 2000 2114 2124 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 2,557
Write 2,791
Mixed 2,528
SusWrite 2,083
562% 2,490 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 101
329% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,069
803% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 380%
Great: 437%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 65.6
MC Write 68.7
MC Mixed 62.4
187% 65.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 25.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 165%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 30 60 16" 1280 720 SDC4185
Typical 960XFH Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Samsung 960XFH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback