Today's hottest deals

Medion MD34687

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD34687  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B550A4-EM
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 15:04
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$101
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 33.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 192
58% 112 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 554
53% 437 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Zotac(19DA 9548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 55
Parallax 47.8
44% 52.3 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 45.1
37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 400
Write 392
Mixed 550
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 32.4
97% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 414
303% 400 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 188%
Verbatim Vi550 S3 512GB
197GB free
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 252 260 19 116 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 486
Write 425
Mixed 335
SusWrite 144
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 24.3
116% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 39.7
90% 182 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 28.5
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 41 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA07B DELL U2412M
Typical MD34687 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Medion MD34687

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback