Lenovo 20351

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20351  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A2
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 08:48
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 84.1
42% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 124
13% 104 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4240
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 4.1
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Ghost SSD 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 387 385 384 391 392 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 472
Write 407
Mixed 390
SusWrite 386
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 18.3
88% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 32.4
71% 140 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
217GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 83 84 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 95.2
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 81
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 63%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 8.8 8.8 8.7 8.8 8.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 0.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.3
8% 6.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KNWMX1-ETB Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1541
Typical 20351 Builds (Compare 1,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20351

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback