Acer Veriton X2665G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton X2665G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X2665G
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 08:01
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 292
37% 282 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Acer(1025 138D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 193 211 211 194 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 685
Write 638
Mixed 604
SusWrite 235
121% 541 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 34.4
118% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 538
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 375
300% 425 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 33 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP322C HP P222va
Typical Veriton X2665G Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X2665G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback