Today's hottest deals

Medion Crawler E50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion Crawler E50  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPxxRNx1
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 15:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 181
2-Core 349
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 923
97% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,179
73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A552) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 6.2
4% 3.87 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-BICS5 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2749 2752 1131 85 97 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,622
Write 2,685
Mixed 1,597
SusWrite 1,152
399% 1,764 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 284
4K Mixed 98.6
371% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,670
DQ Write 1,306
DQ Mixed 1,542
1,139% 1,506 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 315%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 37.1
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 0 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical Crawler E50 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion Crawler E50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback