HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 06:59
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 334
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.1
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 134 132 130 130 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 476
Write 154
Mixed 181
SusWrite 132
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 31.8
124% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 184
157% 236 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 87%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
481GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 20 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 67
Write 17.9
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 18.9
32% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
10% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34" 1280 720 PHLC284 PHL34E1C5600
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback