Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80K4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80K4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 500-15ACZ
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 12:02
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 71.6
34% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 77.8
8-Core 87.3
11% 82.6 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6
Legend(17AA 380A) 80MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 86 81 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 19.6
Write 101
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 87.1
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 19 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO39ED
Typical 80K4 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback