Today's hottest deals

Asus X550CC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550CC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CC
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130812
Uptime39.8 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 16:02
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 97.7
51% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 139
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 341 298 66 70 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 412
Write 363
Mixed 347
SusWrite 161
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 0.8
41% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 45.7
DQ Mixed 1.1
25% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15AB
Typical X550CC Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback