Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 20:06
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 760
73% 601 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 182
Parallax 161
129% 167 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 167
Splatting 122
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,965
Write 1,617
Mixed 1,397
369% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 78.7
255% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 791
581% 768 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Adata DashDrive UV150 USB 3.0 16GB-$39
7GB free, PID dc1a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.4
Write 20.9
Mixed 5.2
31% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 69
MC Mixed 32.8
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 107%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 170 31.5" 2560 1377 ACR078A RG321QU
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback