bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory220GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 220GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory209.6 GB free of 219.951 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 09:50
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V13 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.6% Very good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 911
81% 684 Pts
64-Core 2,560
158% 2,560 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 550GB
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 165 167 152 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (83rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.2% Very good
Read 259
Write 176
Mixed 207
SusWrite 161
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 89
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 23.4
172% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 24.2
28% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 69GB
56GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 81 86 87 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.9% Good
Read 251
Write 252
Mixed 255
SusWrite 82.4
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 40.5
131% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 120
92% 125 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%
Microsoft NVMe Direct Disk 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: NVMDV001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1308 1303 1304 1308 1304 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
220% Outstanding
Read 935
Write 1,342
Mixed 991
SusWrite 1,300
259% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 75.8
278% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 161
188% 307 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 220%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 122GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
59392, 948, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
191% Outstanding
MC Read 91.4
MC Write 64.5
MC Mixed 73.2
218% 76.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 39
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 191%
Great: 364%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 23 32 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback