Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z690 PG Velocita

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics407% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 PG Velocita  (all builds)
Memory112 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$416
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 230
2-Core 458
128% 253 Pts
4-Core 879
8-Core 1,308
136% 1,094 Pts
64-Core 3,486
216% 3,486 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 118%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
407% Outstanding
Lighting 657
Reflection 593
Parallax 794
536% 681 fps
MRender 548
Gravity 584
Splatting 317
379% 483 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 407%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,520
Write 2,298
Mixed 2,312
530% 2,377 MB/s
4K Read 76.7
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 104
330% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,176
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 822
625% 859 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,308
Write 2,322
Mixed 2,167
506% 2,266 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 80.5
250% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 867
669% 929 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$550
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 302
Mixed 421
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 46.4
154% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 337
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$550
3TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 477
Mixed 417
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 47.5
161% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 337
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.6
Write 2.5
Mixed 7.4
13% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.9
135% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88MEBUA081N 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
117% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 41.8
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 29.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 117%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ7954 BenQ EW3280U
Typical Z690 PG Velocita Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 229%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 PG Velocita

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback