Today's hottest deals

HP All-in-One 22-c0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP All-in-One 22-c0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8446
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 21:56
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 351
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
HP(103C 8446) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.87 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.8
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 348 353 359 387 394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 331
Write 305
Mixed 264
SusWrite 368
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 7.6
41% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 4
DQ Mixed 30.1
33% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 20.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 16% 25 108 57 60 38.5" 1280 720 VIZ0098 E390-A1
Typical All-in-One 22-c0xx Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 22-c0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback