Today's hottest deals

MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 16:00
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 161
2-Core 321
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 924
96% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 69.6
38% 57.5 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 41.5
41% 50.6 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 700 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0620A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,847
Write 1,452
Mixed 1,117
326% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 27.6
150% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 368
338% 503 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-ST41 CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FF 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 27.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 30.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 24" 1280 720 VIE2022 J2444VFIPS
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 2,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback