Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 05:28
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 169
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 470
43% 362 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 49.5
45% 55 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 47.4
38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1532 1635 1659 1673 1759 1746 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,152
Write 1,500
Mixed 1,118
SusWrite 1,668
308% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 55.3
186% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 755
540% 690 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 235%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.2% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 21.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback