Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 12 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 597
70% 540 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.4% Good
Lighting 92
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 77.8
75% 86.2 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 77.5
Splatting 70.6
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SWORDFISH 250GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN2813
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 220 224 223 222 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 425
Write 224
Mixed 264
SusWrite 222
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 30.4
138% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 229
185% 265 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 233%
Adata SU630 240GB
68GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 106 6.9 39 38 6.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 508
Write 381
Mixed 342
SusWrite 53.9
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 25
121% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 63.3
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 35
70% 133 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 24.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 24.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 23.8" 1280 720 VSC0D39 XG2405
Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback