MSI B560M PRO (MS-7D20)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D20
MotherboardMSI B560M PRO (MS-7D20)  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 14:35
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 648
64% 524 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 126
Parallax 156
68% 122 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 87.4
Splatting 148
116% 142 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,205
Write 1,541
Mixed 640
321% 1462 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 58.9
176% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 154
162% 273 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
SSD 240GB
116GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 411
Write 248
Mixed 285
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 14.5
63% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 22.4
28% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
WDC WDS100T2B0B 1TB
96GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4089
Write 38.2
Mixed 73.3
291% 1,400 MB/s
4K Read 444
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4
679% 150 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 122%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
343GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 86.3
Mixed 80.8
71% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
618GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,880
Write 13.5
Mixed 19.7
933% 1,305 MB/s
4K Read 419
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.2
17,606% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
68GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 73.8
Write 55.2
Mixed 62.7
48% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Asmt 2105 750GB
629GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 83 76 75 80 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 83.2
Write 89.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 76.5
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 65%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 16GB
15GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.5
Write 10.7
Mixed 4.3
14% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
698GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 33
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 25.3
39% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
23% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 26.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7089 LC32G5xT
Typical B560M PRO (MS-7D20) Builds (Compare 1,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B560M PRO (MS-7D20)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback