Today's hottest deals

Trigem DREAMSYS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemTrigem DREAMSYS  (all builds)
MotherboardECS HARRISON2
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 07:10
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 164
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 262
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Sanyo(144D 8099) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 10.6
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 10.6
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY26V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 203 209 210 224 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 220
Write 188
Mixed 196
SusWrite 212
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 4.7
43% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 15.7
43% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 309GB
32GB free
Firmware: V54OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 58 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 50.9
Write 52
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 58
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CF8 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23" 1920 1017 HWP3187 HP 23cw
Typical DREAMSYS Builds (Compare 799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Trigem DREAMSYS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback