Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 01:10
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 63.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 244
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 574
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 26.9
18% 25.1 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 27
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 938
Write 1,372
Mixed 1,199
264% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 66.2
221% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 748
533% 697 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1086
Write 1,257
Mixed 1,032
252% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.2
194% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 750
539% 712 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
KIOXIA TransMemory 16GB
9GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 16.2
43% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE Crucial CB16GS2666.C8ET 32GB
3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 14.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 15.5" 1536 793 BOE090F
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback