Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 14:32
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 38.8
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 65.4
28% 46 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 100
13% 96.3 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 381A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S650 480GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07992
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 330
Write 348
Mixed 297
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 23.1
78% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 158
112% 143 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 106%
HP USB Flash Drive 16GB
14GB free, PID 1985
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 3.5
4% 3.23 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YKO 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 16 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14C4
Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback