Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120413
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 01 '18 at 20:35
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 452
60% 451 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
MSI(1462 3050) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 31
Parallax 41.8
28% 35.8 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 36.2
26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
398GB free
Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 24.1
60% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.62
126% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 70%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$63
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 60.3
71% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.26
98% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 87%
Msft Virtual Disk 500GB
156GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
Read 86
Write 95.7
Mixed 42.3
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.15
34% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 55.9
72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback