Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 06:14
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N97
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 146
58% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 206
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 3.4
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.9
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-512G 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 951 1000 654 1097 1172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 920
Write 1,230
Mixed 1,016
SusWrite 950
233% 1,029 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 26.1
155% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 215
224% 378 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 160%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS016G-3200ST 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 14 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B4 SAMSUNG
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback