Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 05:46
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$123
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 597
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
PowerColor(148C 2423) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 303
Parallax 647
182% 391 fps
MRender 391
Gravity 256
Splatting 453
308% 367 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 200%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 926 1590 1521 801 396 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,014
Write 1,848
Mixed 1,725
SusWrite 943
366% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 53.2
183% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 644
478% 634 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 223%
Great: 623%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
10GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 145 153 134 147 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 180
Write 160
Mixed 96
SusWrite 143
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 1.3
31% 9.57 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 46%
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
25GB free
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 84 73 65 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 455
Write 149
Mixed 182
SusWrite 79.1
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 30.2
118% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 179
152% 230 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
820GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 159 160 159 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 153
Write 137
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 158
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3000C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 20.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 34.2" 1280 720 DELA212 AW3423DWF
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $586
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback