Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 00:39
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GLP-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 163
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 336
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
178% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 268
Parallax 325
190% 275 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 262
Splatting 191
212% 270 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 178%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 255GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 8 165 170 170 121 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 300
Write 321
Mixed 287
SusWrite 132
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 7.5
30% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 84.3
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 41.8
72% 134 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 37%
Great: 163%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 94 185 189 195 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 49.4
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 168
19% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 3.9
13% 5.57 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 12.7
9% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 16%
Great: 429%
Amd-raid Array 1 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 95 184 186 194 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 14.7
Write 222
Mixed 31
SusWrite 168
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.3
255% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 194%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 20
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 5R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 14% 66 305 15 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5
Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback