bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory22.6 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 63.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 390
51% 385 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 189GB
174GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 29 29 30 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 62.5
Write 62.7
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 29.6
12% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 16
53% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 16.3
12% 16.2 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 275GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 28GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 37.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 30.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 60 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback