QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21 GB free of 23.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 11:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 199
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 628
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P40-6Q
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 966GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 381 380 229 276 271 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 418
Write 397
Mixed 371
SusWrite 318
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 22
74% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 103
78% 106 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 7616 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 32
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 94%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback