Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 21FC001BIX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 21FC001BIX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21FC001BIX
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 08:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 181
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 402
47% 364 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 230A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 13.6
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 13.4
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1288 1305 1609 1691 1115 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,650
Write 1,778
Mixed 1,404
SusWrite 1,393
351% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 64.3
159% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 653
479% 633 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 231%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA095N Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 16GB
5600, 5600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 43.3
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 112%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 8 60 16" 1280 720 LEN41B5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback