Today's hottest deals

Compaq-presario FT970AA-ABG SR5760AN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq-presario FT970AA-ABG SR5760AN  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON VIOLET
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090403
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 07:49
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 33.5
2-Core 66.7
38% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 109
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450
MSI(1462 1181) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.2
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 149 138 115 121 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 222
Write 172
Mixed 199
SusWrite 133
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 28.7
91% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 38.2
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 52
42% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
548GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 94 88 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 89.8
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0837 500GB
62GB free, PID 0837
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 25 25 23 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 53
Write 27.2
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 25.1
39% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 259
16% 259 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 20 60 20.1" 1274 703 DEL4041 DELL 2009W
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback