Today's hottest deals

HP mt41

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP mt41  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2155
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 13:41
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5150M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 16.8
32% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 44.7
6% 43.2 Pts
64-Core 36.2
2% 36.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
HP(103C 2155) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC308 SATA 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 95 105 107 110 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 21 60 14" 1280 720 LGD045E
Typical mt41 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP mt41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback