Asus P8H61-M2/TPM/SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M2/TPM/SI (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130509
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '23 at 11:17
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1620-$49 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 43.7 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 58.7 31% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 71.8 8-Core 79.9 10% 75.9 Pts	64-Core 67 4% 67 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.25% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.25% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: S4200102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 198 Write 184 Mixed 188 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 27.6 93% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 71.5 DQ Mixed 48.2 39% 53 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 128%
Adata Classic C008 USB 2.0 16GB-$14 1,800 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID c08a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 12.3 Write 3.7 Mixed 12.4 11% 9.47 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1333 1x8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	28	14	60	21.6"	1280 720	PHLC081 Philips 226VL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M2/TPM/SI Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M2/TPM/SI

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	2x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 780 4GBNvidiaBench 45%, 988 samples	1x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	1x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	1x
LCH-128V2S-11 2.5 7mm 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 1,579 samples	1x
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 4,113 samples	1x

RAM
CT51264BA160B.C16F 1x4GBCrucialBench 29%, 1,377 samples	1x
9905584-023.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 54%, 166 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $265

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353